Organisations investing in staff development often face the same question: public course or in-house programme? Both work well, in different situations.
Public training Individuals attend a scheduled course alongside participants from other organisations.
Best when:
- Only one or a few staff need the skill.
- You value exposure to peers from other sectors.
- You want to attend on a fixed calendar date.
In-house training A facilitator delivers a programme for your team, at your premises or a venue of your choice.
Best when:
- Several employees need the same skills.
- Content should use your organisation’s policies, systems and examples.
- You want scheduling flexibility.
- You want to discuss sensitive internal issues openly.
Key differences at a glance
| Factor | Public training | In-house training |
|---|---|---|
| Content | Standard course outline | Customised to your needs |
| Schedule | Fixed dates | Agreed with you |
| Best for | Individuals and small groups | Teams and departments |
| Networking | Broad, cross-industry | Within your organisation |
How to decide Start with your goal. If you need broad exposure for one or two people, public training fits. If you want a team aligned on the same approach, in-house training is usually the stronger choice.
Conclusion We offer both formats. Tell us about your team and we will recommend the best fit.